Wednesday, 13 March 2013

"Live TV ads from Afghanistan? Really?"

"Live TV ads from Afghanistan? Really? Like that live Honda Ad. Except with tanks. And guns. In a war zone..... So nothing like the Honda ad. I love it.'

6 months ago Jon & Anita - a creative team at JWT London - came into our office with an idea for the Territorial Army.

It was to be JWT's first piece of work for the Army since winning the account last yearWith such a fantastic body of work from Saatchi's hanging heavy in our minds and a need to recruit extra numbers for the TA, the pressure was on. Several teams had already had a go at the brief with no luck, so we were getting a little twitchy

It was a tricky one. 

From research we knew one of the main things that put applicants off were ads that featured actors pretending to be soldiers. The thing they really liked was seeing action - real action - not blokes with make up on, running around Salisbury Plain. Brutally honest TV docs such as 'The TA and the Taliban' and 'Young Soldiers' that show what it is really like to be a modern soldier is what they want. 


So I imagine all of this was whizzing round Jon & Anita's heads as they came up with what is one of the most audacious ideas I've ever heard: Live ads from a war zone (Afghanistan), broadcast directly into the nation's front rooms on a Saturday night, showing the TA serving alongside the Regular Army.

We loved it for its sheer ambition. In a moment it could change people's perceptions of the TA as a bunch of weekend warriors, to showing them standing alongside the Reg Army firing the same guns, driving the same trucks, wearing the same body armour, harbouring the same fears.

'So a bit like that live Honda' ad I said.

'But with guns. And tanks.
In Afghanistan. 
8 times a weekend.
For 2 weekends on the trot.
With a dedicated youtube channel. 
And simultaneous 'Live' events happening around the UK' J&A replied.

'So nothing like the Honda ad. But I love it.'


The next question: How?

Many meetings followed. Mediacom...C4, ITN, Sky.

'How do we technically pull this off? Who is going to actually go there and shoot this stuff? And most importantly how do we do it without anyone getting killed.'

Everyone said it was going to be hard. A real challenge. Never been done before. Bespoke approach needed. But no one said 'No'. Least of all our brilliant and brave client.

ITN took up the media challenge, with the indomitable Chris Church and his team at the helm.

So after flying out a satellite truck, some very big aerials and a lot of cable, we were ready. 


Next up was the 'war room' at ITN, variously occupied over two weekends by the JWT Army team, Clearcast, our client. And by the end of the second weekend, a lot of empty pizza boxes.











We took live feeds from Afghan. Within seconds these were edited to 48 secs, topped and tailed with intro and outro idents forming a complete 60 second ad. This then needed instant approval from client and Clearcast. If either party rejected the ad (bad language, guns pointing at camera etc), a back up ad was always ready to roll. It was a little jumpy at times, esp when someone pointed a gun at camera and swore,  but overall it ran fairly smoothly, thanks in most part to Chris and the boys at ITN. 





Jon & Anita remarked one of the toughest things was being forced to watch ITV's entire weekend schedule. However by the end I think they were a little partial to people falling over on ice... 

However the real star of the show wasn't dancing on ice or anywhere near Greys Inn road. But he was 3,500 miles away in Afghan holding the camera, barking orders at the TA: Nick Murphy 

Toby Clifton our smart, funny, chain-smoking TV producer had taken up the production challenge, ringing and researching and talking and eventually unearthing Nick, who became our director and general head of all stuff over there in Afghan, ably assisted by Derek Tedder and Kevin Capon from the MOD.

Thankfully no-one got killed, we got two successful weekends of 15 live broadcasts - a first for UK TV - and I hear the phones have been ringing at the TA centres ever since.

Many people made this project happen, but if there was one who really needs the biggest thanks it's Nick. I'll let him take over the reins from here with an interview first published by shots.net 2 weeks ago.






People often use the word ‘brave’ when talking about advertising. “It was a brave campaign.” “They’re a brave client.” But the risks in this industry pale in comparison to those taken on a daily basis by the soldiers on operations in Afghanistan.

In a ground breaking campaign by JWT London for the Territorial Army (TA), the Army Recruiting Group and Capita plc, a company that provides recruiting services, last weekend launched TA Live.
Live commercials were filmed in Afghanistan and screened almost simultaneously on ITV in the UK, showing TA soldiers working alongside the regular Army. Another series of films will air this weekend so we caught up with director Nick Murphy to find out what it’s like to live in a warzone, what the challenges of shooting live TVCs are, and how it feels to work for a client that carries more than one gun.

How did you get involved with the project and what did you think when you first heard about it?
Nick Hirschkorn at Feel films, which represent my advertising work, were approached about the project and there seemed to be a natural match between what the guys at JWT were trying to achieve and the various areas of my career. I grew up in documentaries before I moved into drama and features and the creatives, Jonathan Budds and Anita Davis, didn't want the reality of the spots to be overwhelmed by advertising artifice or conceits. They were after little, high impact windows on the lives of these TA soldiers that told the audience: "Look, this what these guys are doing right now." The TA needs to recruit thousands, so the live ads needed to make the audience take notice and radically shift their perceptions of what the TA is.

What’s living in a war zone like?
Well if you like neat lines and hand washing then I suggest you move to one. It's an OCD paradise. That takes some getting used to. But certainly the fact that you're in a conflict situation, having to work creatively in a conflict situation, is the most immediate challenge. Let's be clear, what the guys and girls out here do is immeasurably more difficult and important, so you have to keep your trap shut with the complaints. But when you're trying to work out how you'll capture a moment or get round a problem and an Apache helicopter thunders overhead, you do get a bit thrown. The place runs with a ruthless efficiency. They all want to help, subject to their primary tasks, but they don't want rambling media twaddle. They just want to know where they need to get what and when. No b***shit. Soho could do with a dose of that.

What kind of challenges does the location add to the project?
All the departments that the people we are following might come into contact with are spread about the place. So progress on access and consent in advance of the live nights was slow. The chain of command is rigid so a meeting to work out what the lads on the ground might be doing when we go live means nothing until you have gone back and cleared it with the correct Commander. I never felt we weren't going to get there but navigating round such a new environment was problematic. It's a far cry from booking Black Island, hiring a crew and pitching up with a storyboard under your arm. Then again, they almost never get mortar attacks at Black Island studios so they can afford to run things differently.

What have been the most difficult problems to overcome?
Planning logistics were a nightmare. This is a war zone and it's a long way away so you can't just drive the satellite truck up to the gates and ask to come in. Toby Clifton at JWT and Steve Ryder who owns the truck and is out here with me, worked through unimaginable paperwork to get the truck onto a RAF C17 and fly it in from the UK.
Then there is the technical challenge of getting our feed from our truck into ITV network at precisely the right time with the correct approvals of Clear Cast and Capita. Chris Church and the team at ITN did all that and it's like making sausages, I honestly don't care to know how they did it.
But from my point of view, the toughest challenge was not making these things into adverts. At least not in the traditional sense of the word. Initially the guys we began shooting with - to get them used to us - would keep spouting the party line. It took quite a while, skills I'd learned in docs, to get them to understand that none of us wanted that. Me, JWT, the client Capita, none of us wanted shiny boys and girls telling us how marvellous it was. We just wanted to glimpse what a TA soldier experiences when he or she is deployed. We didn't want people to learn about TA life, we wanted them to feel something about TA life and be able, through the live immediacy of it, to compare it to their own lives.

Some people would say that shooting live ads is suicide, but in the literally, potentially life-or-death situation you’re working in, it must be a huge amount of pressure. How have you coped?
Up and down. You get moments when you know that something is happening that you can't catch because of the hours - we are 4.5 hours ahead of UK so the primetime slots were pretty late for us. There is also the very real risk that 'operational imperatives' - and that is literally all I am allowed to call them - will interrupt what we are doing, even if we are on air at the time. That's a risk the team were willing to take.
We knew that situations might arise that would pull us off air or eviscerate our best laid plans without notice. But you can't go into this sort of venture without understanding and accepting that. The impact of these ads stems from the fact that it is happening right now in a part of the world where bad things can happen and risks are very real. Yes, that makes the whole project infinitely more challenging and risky than, say, a series of ads from a beach in Ibiza. But that is why they work. And honouring that quality in them has been my job out here.

How supportive of the project has the army been and were there any major concerns from them?
I don't doubt that winning support for this unbelievably ambitious and bold project was tougher than other campaigns and it's a credit to the ambition and determination of Capita and JWT that this ever got off the ground. But the support the Army has given us here has been superb. Cautious but superb. I've been working closely with Derek Tedder from the Land Forces News team, who knows the territory from within but given the Army has other very real concerns to juggle, I'm still amazed we gained the access we have.

How much attention is paid to not revealing classified/sensitive information?
It's been the main concern for the Army while we've been here. For them and of course for me, it is paramount that we don't inadvertently leak information that could put any of our forces or operations at risk. But I'm often unable to judge that. Take an Apache; it doesn't cost £45m without being crammed with stuff the army would rather keep secret.

Have there been any close calls in terms of almost showing something that’s off limits?
I was shooting in a certain helicopter the other day, not live but for some background material, and a huge box right in front of me was "off limits". It was almost impossible to keep out of frame.

There isn’t a great deal happening in one or two of the ads. Was it tempting to try to manufacture something interesting?
No. It became clear that in some of our slots they were just going to be hanging out.
They ended up playing cards. It was a massive slot too, big audience. But I just wanted to let it run. As it turned out, just when we went live, a Chinook helicopter passed a few hundred feet above them. Nobody looked up. They just went on playing cards and chatting like it was the most ordinary thing in the world. It ended up being the oddest and one of my favourite spots so far.

What have been your personal highlights of the experience?
The most memorable moment wasn't a good one. We were outside at one of the locations we might have ended up at that coming weekend when over the Tannoy came the words; "Op Minimise. Op Minimise". They make this call when one of our soldiers has been killed or injured and it bans anyone from making any outward communications until the family in question has been informed. After a few hours it was lifted and it turned out to be a treatable injury but for those moments, those hours, across the camp there was this feeling in the air and to a new boy like me it was so very real and genuinely upsetting. These guys out here are doing the real thing. They do it and sometimes suffer horrendous consequences.

What’s your next project and do you feel like any other job will be a breeze after this?
As a producer mate of mine used to say years ago, "Just whip the clapper boards off it'll fall 




FULL CREDITS


TA Live Credits List
Project name: TA LIVE
Overall Campaign:
Client and Job Title:  Zoe Boustead, Marketing Director, Army Recruiting Group
Creative agency: JWT London
Executive Creative Director: Russell Ramsey
Creative Directors: Hugh Todd & Adam Scholes
Art Director/Creative Director: Anita Davis 
Copy Writer/Creative Director: Jonathan Budds
Business Director in Charge: Pete Womersley
Business Director: Michael Abbott
Planning Director: Lee McEwan
Account Director: Emily Medhurst
Account Manager: Georgina King
Media Planning Agency: Mediacom
Media Planners: Louise Goodman and Matt Weller
Media Buying Agency: M4C
TV:
JWT Integrated Production Director/Producer:  Toby Clifton 
Live Broadcast & Post Production: ITN Productions
ITN Executive Producer: Derek Dyson
ITN Producer: Chris Church
Director: Nick Murphy
Line Producer: Derek Tedder
Cameraman/DP: Kevin Capon
Satellite Engineer: Steve Ryder
Media Buyer: Kevin West
Promo Ads & Title Sequences:
Director / Lead Motion Graphics / Sound Design: James Keane
Additional Graphics: Lizzy Rowlatt
Digital Experience & Social Media:
Executive Digital Creative: Ricardo Figueira 
Account Directors: Neil Brice and Emily Medhurst
Account Managers: John DeGraft Johnson, Georgina King and Siobhan Filmore
Art Director: Lewis Bish
Copywriter: Chris Chance
Digital Project Manager: Charlie Marshall
Designer: Jamie Green
Developers: Ben Garraud and Mickael Coelho
Planners: Kimberly Douglas and Malky Brown
eCRM:
Account Director: Patrick Dent
Copywriter: Ewan Macmillan
Account Managers: Georgina King and Siobhan Filmore
Experiential:
Head of Experiential: Jonathan Terry 
Experiential Producers: David Naylor and Morten Josefsen
Art Director: Chris Jones
Copywriter: Kell Cowan-Lunam
Project Manager: Louise Tench












Thursday, 12 July 2012

The story behind the picture...

...we're sitting in the Whisky Bar at the Sunset Marquis, LA.
It's a warm Saturday night.
As I'm chatting to Andrea, our HSBC client, an arm reaches across from an adjacent booth holding a large gin 'n tonic.
A bizarre mid-Atlantic Brummie voice says 'Ere, you want this?'
I look up and see a wart. A large scary looking one with a bit of hair sticking out.
It looked strangely familiar. Aunt Elizabeth?
Hold it, there's only (other) person in the world with a wart like that.
It's Lemmy from Motorhead.
"It's Lemmy isn't it"
"Yeah that's right"
I take the drink in one hand and hold out the other:
"Toddy, nice to meet you"
"Hmph"
He turns back to his two female companions for the evening. Combined age 34ish.
Not being a massive Motorhead fan this doesn't have a huge effect on me.
However 30mins later the celeb sucker in me decides I should post it on Facebook.
But I need pictorial evidence.
I return and ask my trusty Account Director Hamish to stand ready with iPhone as I approach one of his young ladies.
"Could I have my photo taken with him?"
Presley, that is her name, replies "Of course honey, you come right over."
Lemmy leaves his seat next to Scarlett, the other half of 34ish, and we sit together.
He stretches his arm out, with a large central 'fuck you' middle digit raised firmly to camera. He's definitely done this before. So, when in Rome...
I copy his pose but don't appear so threatening in my confused wardrobe of speccy glasses, zip up Adidas top and IT bloke hair.

'Click'


'Shit.' Hamish mutters under his breath.
Lemmy moves awkwardly in his seat and growls.
The beast from Stoke-on-Trent is not happy.
Me neither. 
Sweat developing on speccy brow.

'Click'



'Fuck. Shit. Sorry Toddy.'
Hamish now shaking slightly.
Lemmy with his Nazi cap looks like he's going to do something to me that Himmler would be proud of.
A small poop is developing in my pants.

'Click'


O God please make it end. 
He's going to kill me. And then probably cut me up and eat me with Presley and Scarlett.  
Worse still, Andrea is really laughing at us now.

'Click'


'Thanks Lemmy, really appreciate that."
"Hmph"
I post it.
And call him 'Lenny'.

Monday, 14 May 2012

The story of England's incredible triumph at Euro 2012



The story of England's incredible triumph at Euro 2012


Sunday 1st July 2012

So finally it's happened. After 46 years of hurt, pain, red mists, false dawns, missed penalties, false dawns and more missed penalties, it's over. England have won something. Euro 2012 Winners. 



Gary Neville, Captain, scorer, legend - a man not a month ago watching from the studio in his suit rather than in an England shirt holding aloft the Henri Delaunay trophy – was the man of the moment. Micah Richards and Leighton Baines broken metatarsals forcing Hodgson to find a replacement in the form of Neville, who thankfully was unwittingly still registered to play.

So up he stepped, the darling of Sky TV in the hour of need. 'Your country needs you Gawwrry' cried the redtops memorable front page. Up he stepped and the rest is history. 92 caps and one glorious scuffed shot from the 18 yards line that was enough to defeat the Poles. 

Whereupon the 20,000 England fans packed into Kiev’s Olympic Stadium sang as one the ear splitting 'Neville Camp Nou warble'. Euro 2012's very own Vuvzuella. 

"This beats them all," say 37-year-old Neville. "But don't count me out for Brazil 2014, although I’m not sure what the Polish builders will think of it - they're still doing my Eco house back home." Don't worry Gary; most people will paint your house for free now.

And arise Sir Roy. Happy Hodgey. Good guy Roy.

"I may be able to say my 'r's now" he joked at the jubilant press conference. Don't do that Roy, we love you the way you are.  It's rumoured he celebrated with a small vodka and a Polish biscuit, citing the team’s success on the book reading group he’d created to build teamwork and sway the lads from cards and twitter. But it wasn't quite like this three weeks ago after the drubbing by France. Dark days indeed.

'Wubbish!' 'Go in the name of Hodg!' And with Terry and Ferdinand languishing in the notorious Pavshino prison, after their brutal training ground bust up, the signs weren't good.

However, Grant Holt - unlikely hero number 2 and his 93rd minute 'bolt' against Sweden saved our skins and then Wellbeck's hat-trick heroics in the must win last game against Ukraine got England out of the group.

Then more madness against Italy with Holt’s brace before Germany in the Semi Final. Lampard's sweet free kick redemption for the denial of South Africa.

And what now for Rooney? Back home before the end of the group stages after his brothel disgrace with Helga Scmidt - a 63 year old Grandmutter.

However, such was the prolific partnership of Holt And Wellbeck he was hardly missed.

Dare we now dream of taking on the world in 2014?

Wio here we come.



Tuesday, 8 May 2012

'Drag Him Away' National Centre for Domestic Violence (NCDV)

'Drag Him Away'
National Centre for Domestic Violence (NCDV)

This story first appeared on shots, 8/05/12




The NCDV wanted to talk about how an injunction can very quickly (within 24 hours) get an abuser 
out of the home, allowing the victim to take back some control, without a constant threat in the house. 

The injunction actually states the abuser must be 100m away from the victim. This was a really interesting fact – a real nugget – that was just begging to be used.

What’s more, a third party can help instigate the injunction by approaching the ncdv themselves. So that was the brief: distance + intervention. The next question. How? 

We played with all sorts of ideas involving distance – from trying to corrupt Google Maps and Google Streetview to creating Adshels that recognise your face at 100m. None of them were quite right. Either too complicated to execute or too costly.

We very nearly ran it on a large interactive screen in a shopping centre where a passer-by could literally drag the man away by using a touch screen. It seemed like a great idea, until we realised the screen was only 8ft long. So in reality the 'nasty bastard', as we started to call him, would still be within a few feet of the poor woman, when he’d been dragged away. Not far enough for anyone’s liking. Plus the shopping centre owners were nervous about the whole tone of the piece and how it might upset their shoppers.

By this point Neil Morris from Grand Visual was involved, talking to various media owners, sourcing interactive screens that could host the idea and utilise Grand Visual’s Agentplatform, which enables mobile and digital out of home interaction. Enter JCDecaux and their large format e-motion screens in Euston Station. From there we quickly got to the idea of our man being moved across the screens after being ‘dragged away’ on a mobile screen in the concourse.







So the media was sorted.

But typically the director now wasn't. He'd just been confirmed on another job and couldn’t do it. Anthony Falco and Toby Clifton quickly stepped in and approached the BAFTA nominated Samuel Abrahams at Smuggler. With only a few days notice he sorted it – casting two very real characters who gave great performances. The male character really let fly. Which looks even more disturbing when it's mute. 

A key factor in the execution of the work was how our man appears as he’s dragged away. We did several tests and found the optimum was to keep him doing the same action, but slowly take him away from her. At one point he was going to react to a cursor dragging him away but it felt a bit over the top and hammy - we didn’t want it to appear like a game, so had to be sensitive in his actions. We tried moving him at several speeds. Too fast and it looked comedy, too slow and you lose the impact of the line.


We really wanted the public to intervene. We thought it would feel quite empowering to physically get the Nasty Bastard away from her. You’d feel like you’d done something good on the way through the station, where the 30-minute dwell time was more than enough for people to become interested and interact with the work.

The way the work ended up is probably in its best format. In a large public space where people can feel empowered by intervening in the abuse by using their phone. We hope they’ll use their phones in the future, if they ever come across a real case of domestic abuse.
































Technology has completely changed the landscape when it comes to sectors like print and poster. Ideas should and will always be king. But (as creatives) we need to be aware of new ever-changing technology and how we can use it to our advantage. 

Ideally you want to be first to use the technology in the most creative manner possible. In the pre-digital era this idea would maybe have involved twin 48 sheets - adjacent poster sites - where the man is in one poster the woman in the other. An ok idea, but a bit static. 


This version is more involving and dynamic. Technology has enriched the viewers experience by allowing them to participate and hopefully make the communication stronger and more memorable.

The impact that the mobile phone is having on interactive advertising is staggering. I bet this idea will be out of date before the year is out. 

But however fast the technology develops, we should always try and make the idea relevant to the technology. Or better still, make the technology relevant to the idea...."


This story first appeared on shots, 8/05/12













Wednesday, 30 November 2011

What is the greatest topical ad of all time?

A sexy blonde in a Santa outfit with two perfectly placed advent calendar doors over her breasts.
Hmmm. Christmas topical ads.

For some reason I remembered this the other day. It got me thinking, apart from desperately wanting to open those doors, what goes into making a cracking topical ad?

Lynx 'Advent Calendar' by BBH

Timing? Wit? The detail the team have gone to?
Naked flesh?

It's possibly all these. But the most important thing is a great campaign to bounce your idea off. 

Lynx, Nike, Marmite, Kit Kat to mention just a few, all have fantastic campaigns that can quickly and seamlessly accommodate a topical ad.

Whereas brands that haven't committed to building a distinct campaign will always struggle.

So what is the greatest topical ad of them all?

If the conversations I've had in the past week are anything to go by, that's a big question. It started out as a bit of banter and ended up with people sending reams of links, stills and wandering in with old copies of D&AD and even topical ads that hadn't been made but lie dormant in the bottom draw.

Well I'm going to go against protocol here and jump straight in with the winner.

Nike 'Arsena' by W+K









It's genius. A perfect fit between Nike and the Arsenal team of 2003 / 2004. It ran the day after they'd remained undefeated for a whole season. It is beautiful in concept and execution. For such an historic achievement it's brilliantly humble. I remember seeing it as a strip ad in the Evening Standard.  Only once. But it was seared into my brain. Like Sir John Heg says, you don't need to run an ad to death spending millions on media. If you run an ad just once and it's good enough it'll work (I'm sure he said it much more elegantly than that).

As a Man Utd fan it pains me to praise such an ad. And yes, I am aware in the history of topical ads, no one has devoted more time and effort than the footy obsessed creative. And being our national sport, why not?

There were other contenders, see below. And others that couldn't be traced - most notably a very old press ad for Sainsbury's on budget day. Norman Lamont coming out of No. 10 with a Sainsbury's carrier bag with its then endline 'Good food costs less at Sainsbury's'.  The headline read 'No surprises so far.'

Amid the banter and debate, there was consensus that there is a difference between a topical ad and a tactical ad.

A pure topical ad is of the moment. An event occurs. A creative writes the ad in the shower / on the bog / on the way to work. And then he/she starts desperately trying to get it approved by CD, client and placed in the media for the next morning. A nice recent example is this bicycle ad for the riots, from those lovely chaps at BETC London.

Micycle 'Looters' by BETC London



The ad appeared in the press the next day with seeming ease, but I bet there were a whole lot of people paddling madly under the water to get it done.

By their nature topical ads are reactive. Something unusual has to happen, such as Britney Spears' bizarre 55-hour marriage (Did she fart in bed? Did he refuse to take his socks off?), so that Lynx could jump on it and create a brilliant press ad the following day that rightly found itself in D&AD.


Lynx 'Britney' by BBH

























Tactical ads feel a little more planned in their nature. A good example is the 'St Wayne' poster by W+K for Nike before the South Africa World Cup. A shoot was planned, bit of retouching done and lots of lovely media booked. It was the best thing the Roo managed that summer. 

Nike 'St Wayne' by W+K



















And the online version where Rooney is holding Ronaldo's head was even better and was probably more of a topical ad... of the tactical ad. Or was it a viral ad of the tactical ad?
























So the contenders, in a very loose order....

'Chris Christmas' from Mother


















Polo 'Stamp' by JWT




Ministry of Defence in Colombia 'Operation Christmas' by LoweSSP3 Bogota


















Nike 'Y2K Jogger' by W+K











T-Mobile 'Royal Wedding' viral by Saatchi & Saatchi




Conservative Party 'Labour isn't working' by Saatchi & Saatchi
























Speechbreaker by Lean Mean Fighting Machine





Schweppes 'Sven' by Mother



























Saatchi in-house ad when the Berlin Wall came down


Hamlet 'Botham' by CDP
Beefy Botham was caught smoking hash. The next day Hamlet ran this. 
Can you imagine trying to convince a client to do that today...




Land Rover Discovery 'Conditions' by RKCR / Y&R


Hamlet 'C4 Ident' by CDP


















18-30 'Bush' by Saatchi & Saatchi





































Marmite 'Jose' by DDB


















FHM 'Beckham' by BBH






















And finally back to the beginning. Is this the greatest Christmas stunt of all time? Father Christmas being turned red and white by Coke in the fifties.
















Thanks everyone who chipped in, esp Henry at the NMA.
Please feel free to agree / disagree or offer up your own topical ads...




















Sunday, 20 November 2011

How do you choose a director for your TV commercial?

The other day I was trying to sell a director to a client. It wasn’t going well. I kept thinking, 'why aren’t they buying him? He’s bloody brilliant. One of the best in town.'

The trouble was so much of it was in my head; 16 years of making ads, locked away deep in my skull. But it wasn’t as easy as I imagined to explain to my client why he was the man for the job.

So I went back to the office and asked myself what goes into choosing the right director.

The reel? The treatment? Is he a good bloke? Will the production company supply hookers and a yacht at Cannes?

After getting a script through the Creative Director, Research, BACC, the Client and over a million and one other hurdles, it’d be a shame to give your baby to a wrong ‘un.

The reel
Sounds obvious, but have they directed enough of the right type of work? Say you’ve got a comedy script, how do they deal with casting, performance and timing? If you strip away the beautiful cinematography and pumping soundtrack, is there anything left? If you’re just after a ‘look’ that’s fine.  But it's important to know the difference. A guy whose background is in effects won’t be so good for a dialogue heavy spot. 

Who comes up with the shortlist of potential directors - creative or producer? There seems to be no rule. I remember at BBH working with Philippa Crane.  She came in with a stack of directors I'd never heard of. All brilliant; rap promo directors from the US, quirky short film directors from Sweden, students fresh from Central Saint Martin's. She was amazing. It's no surprise she was the one who discovered Flat Eric on Quentin Dupieux’s reel.

BBH have a fantastic heritage in breaking new directors, whether through the efforts of individual producers or more company inspired initiatives such as Mint Source, an in-house monthly showreel of up and coming directing talent, compiled by Head of TV Frances Royal and the enigmatic Toby Clifton.

Other places to spot new talent are short film festivals, shots, promos on MTV and of course the Daddy of them all, the Saatchi & Saatchi Cannes New Directors Showcase.

The question is do you take a gamble on possibly your only script of the year with a new unproven director? Or stick with the tried and tested established director? Maybe the treatment will help decide. 
  
The treatment
Does the treatment show the director understands the idea? Again, this sounds obvious but sometimes you can just tell that the way they bypass your main gag they just haven’t ‘got it’. Has the treatment taken your idea on? Or is it merely your script rewritten in poncey language with a funky front page? The brilliant 'Truth in Advertising' Director's Pitch sketch comes to mind here.

How hungry are they?  Legend has it when Tarsem treated for the Levis ‘Swimmer’ spot for Larry & Rooney at BBH, he came in with a wad of paper 3 inches thick. Literally filled to bursting with ideas and visuals and reference. More a short novel than your regular couple of pages of treatment. He’d only previously done a couple of promos but he got the job. And the rest is history (how it never won a fucking pencil we’ll never know).

The director in the flesh
The reel is great. The treatment is genius. What could go wrong? You meet. Oh fuck bollocks shit. He turns out to be an awkward French twat who speaks no English, defers every question to his producer and wears sunglasses indoors.

When it’s 3am on the last day of the shoot, pissing down, everyone’s pissed off, but you’re not convinced you’ve got the best take, will he do another? You’re going to have to work with this guy for weeks. Team players are always welcome. 

And what about Hollywood directors. Who wouldn’t want a name from Tinseltown directing their TV spot.  But do they really give a fuck? Or are they filling in between movies? Do they have the discipline to tell a story in 30 secs, not 3 hours? Frances Ford Coppola treated on an Illy Cafe script. It's a long story I've been told by the creatives, as was his treatment. 3 minutes was the shortest he said he could do it. Worse still, he bypassed the creative team completely thereafter and sent his treatment directly to the client. Nice.

Working with a Hollywood director could be a great brag to your mates. But you have to ask if Christopher Nolan genuinely wants to make your yogurt spot the most famous work of the year? 

There have been successes. Michael Mann's Lucky Star for Mercedes was amazing. Wes Anderson for Amex snaffled a pencil and David Lynch's spot for PS2 was suitably weird. But for every one of those there’s a Spike Lee shitfest that’s sunk without trace.

Directors who were ex-creatives is another interesting scenario / potential for a punch up. It’s a really good way to get another creative mind on the job. Often rewriting your script to great effect. Messrs Palmer, Squibb and others are very good at this and have the awards to show for it. 

However it can also bring up a whole new bunch of issues, with too many Creative Directors stirring the creative pot. Trying to jump in between Bruce Crouch and Chris Palmer is not something I'd like to do again in a hurry. 

And finally how about those hookers, yachts and other dubious reasons to work with someone? I worked next to a team who continually based their choice of director on the locations said director was putting forward. The further away the location, the more air miles they'd get, the more likely the director was to get the gig. And the shitter the work got. Nice tan boys, shame about the ad. 

After weighing up the pros, the cons, the reel, the treatment, the reputation, the hunger, the answer lies with you. And your gut. Possibly still the most reliable thing to base your choice on. 

Good luck.